Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

INNOVACIÓN Y TECNOLOGÍA

Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2011): La competitividad, elemento clave para la recuperación económica

The influence of cultural Differences on the perception of a web site :a comparision between México and U.S

Enviado
junio 27, 2016
Publicado
2017-03-27

Resumen

Research on cultural differences has been based on disciplines such as anthropology, business or communication, focusing on cultural differences and the perception of the site, but always with a technical scheme. The cultural background in the development of the Website is important to avoid mistakes that may cause bad image to the customer. Nantel and Glaser (2008) have found that language, a major cultural factor, is less important when the quality of the offered products is attractive to the buyers.  To see how the website is perceived by two different cultures a Website was made by Spanish speaking country (Mexico), but designed in English, trying to remove traces of the cultural background from the Mexican company that designed and implemented the website.

Citas

  1. Aºberg, J & Shahmehri, N. (2000). The Role of Human Web Assistants in E-Commerce: An Analysis and a Usability Study. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy. 10 (2), 114-125.
  2. Agarwal, R; & Venkatesh, V. (2002). Assessing a Firm’s Web Presence: A Heuristic Evaluation Procedure for the Measurement of Usability. Information Systems Research, 13 (2), 168 –186.
  3. Alberts-Miller, N. & Gelb, B. (1996). Business advertising appeals as a mirror of cultural dimensions: A study of eleven countries. Journal of advertising, 25 (4), 57-70.
  4. AMIPICI. Estudio de comercio electrónico (2008). Asociación Mexicana de Internet., Retrieved January 10, 2009 from [URL]: http://www.amipci.org.mx/temp/Estudio_AMIPCI_comercio_electrónico_2008_pdf0824573001220380781OB.pdf
  5. Anderson, J.C; & Gerbing, D.W. (1988). Structural Equation Modelling in Practice: a Review and Recommended Two-Step Approach. Psychological Bulletin. 103 (3), 411-423.
  6. Barber W., & Badre, A. (1998). Culturability: the merging of culture and usability. HFWeb ’98. Retrieved September 21, from [URL]: http://www.research.att.com/conf/hfWeb/
  7. Becker, S.A; & Mottay, F. (2001). A Global Perspective on Web Site Usability. IEEE software. 18 (1), 54-61.
  8. Chaney, L. H; & Martin, J.S. (2005). Intercultural Business Communication. New Jersey: Pearson Prantice Hall
  9. Dedrick, J. Gurbaxani, V., Kraemer, K.L. (2003). Information technology and economic performance: A critical review of the empirical evidence. ACM Computing Surveys, 35 (1), 1-29.
  10. Falk, L., Sockel, H., Warren, H. (2007). A holistic view of internet marketing. Competition Forum. Indiana. 5 (1), 9-14.
  11. Fang, X; & Holsapple, C. W. (2007). An empirical study of Web site navigation structures' impacts on Web site usability Source. Decision Support Systems. 43 (2), 476-491
  12. Ferreira, R. (2002). Culture and E-Commerce: Culture based preferences for interface information design. Unpublished thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, VA.
  13. Gibbs, J., Kraemer, K., Dedrick, J. (2003). Environment and Policy factors Shaping Global E-Commerce Diffusion: A Cross-Country Comparison. The Information Society. 19, 5-18.
  14. Gray, W. D., & Salzman, M. C. (1998). Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods. [Electronic Version]/Human-Computer Interaction [on-line], 13, 3, 203-261. Retrieved June 7, 1999 from [URL] http://www.hfac.gmu.edu/~gray/pubs/papers/Gray&Salzman98_HCI.html
  15. Hall, M., De Jong, M; Steehounder, M. (2004). Cultural Differences and Usability Evaluation: Individualistic and. Technical Communication, 51 (4), 489.
  16. Hofstede, G. (2010). Valores culturales por país Retrieved September 2010 from [URL] http://www.geert-hofstede.com.
  17. House, R. J., Hanges, P.J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., Gupta, V., (2002) Cultures, Leadership, and Organizations: Cultures, Leadership, and Organizations: GLOBE – a 62 Nation Study. California: Thousand Oaks, and Sage Publishing.
  18. Junglas, I., & Watson, R. (2004). National Culture and Electronic Commerce. A comparative study of U.S and German Web Sites. E-Service Journal. 3(2), 3-34.
  19. Keeker, K. (2004). Improving Web-site usability and appeal: Guidelines compiled by MSN usability research. Retrieved february 7, 2004, from [URL]http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/enus/dnsiteplan/html/improvingsiteusa.a sp
  20. Kim, K.H.,& Yun, H.(2007). Cying for me, cying for us: Relational dialectics in a Korean social network site. Journal of computer-mediated communication. (15:1).
  21. Koh, C.E. & Chong, H. (2002). Does the internet improve business? An empirical inquiry into the perceived strategic value and contribution of the internet.Journal of international techonology& information management, 11 (1), 81-97.
  22. Linjun, H., Ming-Te, L., Wong, B. K. (2003).The impact f power distance on email acceptance: Evidence from the PRC. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 44 (1), 93-101.
  23. Lynch, P., Kent, R., Srinivasan, S. (2001). The Global Internet Shopper: Evidence from Shopping Tasks in Twelve Countries. Journal of Advertising Research, 9 .15 -23.
  24. Marcus, A; & Gould, E.W. (2000). Crosscurrents-cultural dimensions and global user-interfaz design. Interactions,7 (4), 32-46.
  25. Matei, S; & Ball-Rokeach, S.J. (2001). Real and virtual social ties. American Behavioral Scientist 45 (3). 550-564.
  26. Matsumoto, D., Takeuchi S., Andayani, S., Kouznetsova, N., Krupp, D. (1998). The Contribution of Individualism vs. Collectivism to Cross-national Differences in Display Rules, Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 1(2),147-165.
  27. Miura, A.,& Yamashita, K. (2007) Psychological and social influences on blog writing: An online survey of blog authors in Japan. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 12 (4), 15.
  28. Nantel, J., & Glaser, E. (2008). The impact of language and culture on perceived website usability.Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 25 (1-2), 112-122.
  29. Nath, R; & Murthy, N.R. (2004). A study of the relationship between Internet difusión and Culture. Journal of Internacional. Technology and Information Culture, 13 (12), 124-132.
  30. Nielsen, J. (2002) Top Ten Guidelines for Homepage Usability. Jakob Nielsen's Alertbox, Retrieved may 8, 2002 from [URL] http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20020512.html
  31. Ogbonna, E; & Harris, L. (2007). The impact of cultural and political dynamics on web site design, development, and implementation. An exploration of potential pitfalls. Personnel Review. 36 (6) 918-938
  32. Palmer, J. (2002). Web site usability, design, and Performance Metrics. Information Systems Research, 13 (2), 151 – 167.
  33. Postava-Davignon, C., Kamachi, C., Clarke, C., Kushmerek, G., Rettger, M., Monchamp, P., Ellis, R. (2004). Incorporating Usability Testing into the documentation Process. Technical Communication, 51 (1), 36 – 44.
  34. Quesenbery, W. (2001). What Does Usability Mean: Looking Beyond “Ease of Use”. Retrieved may 21, 2003 from [URL] www.wqusability.com/articles/more-than-ease-of-use.html.
  35. Roy, M. C; Dewit, O; Aubert, B.A. (2001).The impact of interface usability on trust in Web retailers. Internet Research; 11 (5).
  36. Trompenaars, F; & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the Waves of Culture: Understanding Diversity in Global Business, New-York: McGraw-Hill
  37. Ueltschy, L. C., Krampf, R; Yannopoulos, P. (2004). A cross-national study of Perceived consumer risk towards online (Internet) Purchasing. Multinacional Business Review, 12 (2), 59-82.
  38. Yano, M., Seo, Y. (2003). Conflicts among Net news participants and cultural backgroud. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 13 (5), 386-399.
  39. Yeniryurt, S., Townsend, J.D. (2003). Does culture explain acceptance of new products in a country? Internacional Marketing Review, 29 (4), 377-396.
  40. Zandpour, F., Harich, K. R. (1996). Think and feel country cluster: A new approach to international advertising standardization. International Journal of Advertising, 15, 325-344.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>