Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

RESPONSABILIDAD SOCIAL Y SUSTENTABILIDAD

Vol. 7 Núm. 1 (2013): Competitividad Global. Desafíos Políticos y Financieros: ISBN 978-607-96203-0-2

Factores que desarrollan la actitud Steward del director y el desarrollo del recurso humano

Enviado
junio 15, 2016
Publicado
2018-08-28

Resumen

En el presente documento busca servir de sustento para una futura investigación donde se utilizaran las teorías de stewardship y la de stakeholder para desarrollar los constructos: actitud de servicio (steward) del director general y competencias centrales y colaboración del recurso humano, para lo cual se aplicó una encuesta a ochenta empresas tanto en México como en Colombia, con fines a desarrollar una investigación futura donde se hará un análisis comparativo. Después se desarrolla un análisis factorial para validar cada uno de los constructos. Se concluye que los constructos son válidos y la muestra apropiada para desarrollar dicho estudio.

Citas

  1. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99 – 121.
  2. Barney, J. B., Wright, P. M. (1998). On becoming a strategic partner: the role of human resources in gaining competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 31 – 46.
  3. Becker, B. E., & Huselid, M. A. (2006). Strategic human resources management: Where do we go from here? Journal of Management, 32, 898-925.
  4. Caldwell, C., Truong, D., Linh, P., Tuan, A. (2010). Strategic Human Resource Management as Ethical Stewardship. Journal of Business Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10551-010-0541-y
  5. Davis, J. H., Allen, M. R., Hayes, H. D. (2010). Is Blood Thicker Than Water? A Study of Stewardship Perceptions in Family Business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 10, 1093 – 1115.
  6. Davis, J. H., Schoorman, F. D., Donaldson, L. (1997). Toward a stewardship theory of management. The Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 20 – 47
  7. Déniz - Déniz, M. de la C. & De Saá - Pérez, . (2003). A Resource-based View of Corporate Responsiveness toward Employees. Organization Studies, 24(2), 299–319
  8. Eddleston, K. A., Kellermanns, F. W., Sarathy, R. (2008). Resource Configuration in Family Firms: Linking Resources, Strategy Planning and Technological Opportunities to Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 26 – 50. DOI: 10.1111/j1467-6486.2007.00717.x
  9. Fox, M. A., Hamilton, R. T. (1994). Ownership and Diversification: Agency Theory or Stewardship Theory. Journal of Management Studies, 31(1), 69 – 81.
  10. Freeman, R. E.: (1984). Strategic Management: a Stakeholder Approach, Boston: PittmanBallinger.
  11. Hayes, B. E. (1999). Como medir la satisfacción del cliente: Diseño de encuestas, uso y métodos de análisis estadístico. México: Alfaomega – Oxford
  12. Jensen, C., & Meckling, W. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. In T. Clarke (Ed.), Theories of Corporate Governance: The Philosophical Foundations of Corporate Governance (pp. 58-63). USA and Canada: Routledge.
  13. Judge, W. Q, Naoumova, L. & Koutzevol, N. (2003). Corporate Governance and Firm Performance in Russia: An Empirical Study. Journal of World Business 38 (4).
  14. Konzelmann, S., Conway, N., Trenberth, L., Wilkinson, F. (2006). Corporate Governance and Human Resource Management. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 44(3), 541 – 567.
  15. Lane, P. J., Cannella, A. A., Lubatkin, M. H, (1998). Agency problems as antecedents to unrelated mergers and diversification: Amihud and Lev reconsidered. Strategic Management Journal, 19(6), 555 – 579.
  16. Le Breton – Miller, I., Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. Stewardship in Public Family Firms: A Social Embeddedness Reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1169 – 1191.
  17. Lee, P.M., O’Neill, H. M. (2003). Ownership Structures and R&D Investments of U.S. and Japanese Firms: Agency and Stewardship Perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 46(2), 212 – 225.
  18. Lepak, D. P., Snell, S. A. (2002). Examining the Human Resource Architecture: The Relationships Among Human Capital, Employment, and Human Resource Configurations. Journal of Management, 28(4), 517 – 543.
  19. López-Gamero, M. D., Claver-Cortés, E. & Molina-Azorín, J. F. (2008). Complementary Resources and Capabilities for an Ethical and Environmental Management: A Qual/Quan Study. Journal of Business Ethics. 82, 701–732
  20. López Cabrales, A., Perez – Luño, A, Valle – Cabrera, R. (2009). Knowlwedge as a mediator between HRM practices and innovative activity. Human Resource Management, 48(4), 485 – 503.
  21. Martínez Lucio, M., Stuart, M. (2002). Assessing the principles of partnership: Workplace trade union representatives’ attitudes and experiences, Employee Relations, 24 (3), 305 – 320
  22. Miller, D., Le Breton–Miller, I. (2008). Family Governance and Firm Performance: Agency, Stewardship, and Capabilities. Family Business Reviw, 19(1), 73 – 87
  23. Miller, D., Le Breton – Miller, I., Scholnick, B. (2008). Stewardship vs. Stagnation: An Empirical Comparison of Small Family and Non – Family Businesses. Journal of Management Studies, 45(1), 51 – 78.
  24. Minichilli, A., Corbetta, G., MacMillan, I. C. (2010). Top Management Teams in Family – Controlled Companies: Families, Faultlines, and Their Impact on Financial Performance. Journal of Management Studies, 47(2), 206 – 222. Doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00888.x
  25. Muth, M. M., Donaldson, L. (1998). Stewardship Theory and Board Structure: a contingency approach. Scholarship Research and Theories Papers, 6(1), 5 – 27.
  26. Rashid, A. (2013). Corporate Governance, Executive Pay and Firm Performance: Evidence from Bangladesh. International Journal of Management, 30(2), 556 – 554.
  27. Rodrigo, P., Arenas, D. (2008). Do Employees Care About CSR Programs? A Typology of Employees According to their Attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics. 83(2), 265 – 284.
  28. Said, R. H., Yaacob, Z., Awang, N., Ismail, J. (2009). Chief Executive Officer Duality and Company Performance: A Case of Malaysian Companies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 1(6), 120 – 142.
  29. Supangco, V. T. (2006). HR Involvement in Corporate Governance. Philippine Management Review, 13, 101 – 116
  30. Taylor, R. G., Lynham, S. A. (2013). Systemic leadership for socio-political stewardship. South. Africa Journal Business Management, 44(1), 87 – 99.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>