Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

VENTAJA COMPETITIVA Y DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO

Vol. 8 Núm. 1 (2014): Innovación y competitividad. Impulsores del desarrollo. ISBN: 978-607-96203-0-3

La adopción de las actividades de innovación en las pymes de Aguascalientes

Enviado
noviembre 30, 2016
Publicado
2018-01-05

Resumen

La incertidumbre que impera en los negocios aunado al elevado nivel de competitividad que demanda un mercado cada vez más globalizado, está ocasionado que las organizaciones, primordialmente las pequeñas y medianas empresas, tengan que reorientar sus estrategias empresariales para adecuarlas a los cambios que demanda el mercado, o bien adoptar e implementar nuevas estrategias que faciliten la permanencia en el mercado. Así, la innovación está siendo considerada por un número cada vez mayor de empresas como una estrategia que puede incrementar el nivel de competitividad de las organizaciones de manera significativa. Sin embargo, los resultados obtenidos en este trabajo de investigación indican que las pequeñas y medianas empresas de Aguascalientes, no realizan de manera frecuente actividades de innovación como parte de sus actividades cotidianas no como una estrategia empresarial. Palabras clave: Innovación, MiPymes.

Citas

  1. Atauhene-Gima, K. (1996). Market orientation and innovation. Journal of Business Research, 35(2), 93-103.
  2. Bamberger, P., Bacharanch, S., & Dyer, L. (1989). Human resource management and organizational effectiveness: High technology entrepreneurial startup firms in Israel. Human Resource Management, 28(3), 349-66.
  3. Cooper, R. G. (2011). Perspective: The innovation dilemma: how to innovate when the market is mature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 28(1), 2-27
  4. Damanpour, F. & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of organizational Lag. Administrative Science Quarterly, 9, 392 - 409.
  5. Danneels, E. (2002). The dynamics of product innovation and firms competences. Strategic Management Journal, 23(12), 1095-1121.
  6. Han, J., Kim, N. & Srivastava, R. (1998). Market orientation and organizational performance: Innovation a missing link?. Journal of Marketing, 62(4), 30-46.
  7. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business School Press.
  8. Karniouchina, E. V., Victorino, L. & Verma, R. (2006). Product and service innovation: Ideas for future cross-disciplinary research. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(3), 274-280.
  9. Kash, D. E. & Rycoft, R. W. (2000). Patterns of innovating complex technologies: A framework for adaptive network strategies. Research Policy, 29(7-8), 819-831.
  10. Li, C. R., Lin, C. J. & Chu, C. P. (2008). The nature of market orientation and the ambidexterity of innovations. Management Decision, 46(7), 1002-26.
  11. Lieberman, M. B. & Montgomery, D. B. (1988). First-mover advantages. Strategic Management Journal, 9(1), 41-58.
  12. Lilien, G. L., Morrison, P. D., Searls, K., Sonnack, M. & Von Hipple, E. (2002). Performance assessment of the lead user idea generation process for new products development. Management Science, 48(8), 1042-59.
  13. Lin, Y. (2001). A study of the relationship among market orientation, learning communication industry in science garden. Unpublished paper for doctor degree of business administration, National Sun Yat-Sen University (in Chinese).
  14. Lin, C. Y. Y. & Chen, M. Y. C. (2007). Does innovation lead to performance? An empirical study of SMEs in Taiwan. Management Research News, 30(2), 115-132.
  15. Livingston, D. D. & Berkes, L. J. (1989). Netmap: An innovation diagnostic tool. Journal of managerial Psychology, 4(4), 7-14
  16. Makhija, M. (2003). Comparing the resource-based and market-based views of the firm: Empirical evidence from Czech privatization. Strategic Management Journal, 24(5), 433-451.
  17. Man, T. W. Y., Lau, T. & Chan, K. F. (2002). The competitiveness of small and medium enterprises: A conceptualization with focus on entrepreneurial competencies. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(2), 123-142.
  18. Mariotti, F. (2011). Knowledge mediation and overlapping in interfirms network. Journal of Knowledge Management, 15(6), 875-889.
  19. Mitchell, G. (1990). Alternative frameworks technology strategy. European Journal of Operational Research, 47(4), 153-61.
  20. Nassimbeni, G. (2003). Local manufacturing systems and global economy: Are they compatible?: The case of the Italian eyewear district. Journal of Operation Management, 21(2), 151-171.
  21. Parnaby, J. (1991). Designing effective organization. International Journal of Technology Management, 6(1/2), 15-32.
  22. Pennings, J. M., Barkema, H. & Douma, S. (1994). Organizational learning and diversification. Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 608-40.
  23. Sanders, R. D., Ranney, G. B. & Leitnaker, M. G. (1989). Continual improvement: A paradigm for organizational effectiveness. Survey of Business, 25(1), 22-37.
  24. Slater, S. F. & Narver, J. C. (1994). Does competitive environment moderate the market orientation-performance relationship?. Journal of Marketing, 58(1), 46-55.
  25. Subramaian, A. & Nilakanta S. (1996). Organization innovativess: Exploring the relationship between organization determinants of innovation, types of innovation, and measures of organizational performance. International Journal of Management Science, 24(6), 631-647.
  26. Thompson, V. A. (1965). Bureaucracy and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 5(6), 1-20.
  27. Tushman, M. & Nadler, D. (1986). Organizing for innovation. California Management Review, 22(1), 74-92.
  28. Zahra S. A., de Belardino, S. & Boxx, W. R. (1998). Organizational innovation: Its correlates and its implications for financial performance. International Journal of Management, 5, 133-142.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>