Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

GESTIÓN DEL CONOCIMIENTO Y CREACIÓN DE VALOR

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2013): Competitividad Global. Desafíos Políticos y Financieros: ISBN 978-607-96203-0-2

La propiedad intelectual en la pyme de Aguascalientes: Un estudio empírico

Submitted
June 14, 2016
Published
2018-08-28

Abstract

La propiedad intelectual es un importante tópico que comúnmente ha sido analizado en las grandes empresas de los países desarrollados, y se ha descuidado bastante su análisis y discusión en un contexto de las pequeñas y medianas empresas tanto de los países desarrollados como de los países de economía emergente, aún cuando éstas representan más del 98 por ciento de las empresas, dan empleo a un poco más del 50 por ciento de la fuerza laboral y producen más del 50 por ciento del Producto Interno Bruto (PIB) de cualquier país. Por lo tanto, el objetivo central de este estudio empírico es la medición de la propiedad intelectual en las pequeñas y medianas empresas a través de tres factores: patentes, registro de marcas e inversión en imagen, considerando para ello una muestra de 125 empresas asentadas en el Estado de Aguascalientes (México).

References

  1. Acs, Z.J., Mork, R., Shaver, J.M. and Yeung, B. (1997). The internationalization of small and mediumsized enterprises: a policy perspective, Small Business Economics. 9, 7-20.
  2. Anderson, J. and Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach, Psychological Bulletin. 13, 411-423.
  3. Arrow, K.J. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention, In The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  4. Arrow, K.J. (1983). Innovation in large and small firms, In Ronen, J. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship. Massachusetts: Lexington Books.
  5. Arundel, A. and Kabla, I. (1998). What percentage of innovations are patented? Empirical estimates for European firms. Research Policy, 27, 127-141.
  6. Augustine, M.J. (1993). Intellectual property rights, Interiors. 158, 28-30.
  7. Awanohara, S. (1992). Roll of dishonor: Asian countries head list of US targets, Far Eastern Economic Review. 155, 46-47.
  8. Bagozzi, R.P. and Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science. 16(1), 74-94.
  9. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models, Psychological Bulletin. 107(2), 238-246.
  10. Bentler, P.M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino. CA: Multivariate Software.
  11. Bentler, P.M. and Bonnet, D. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin. 88, 588-606.
  12. Bérard, C. and Delerue, H. (2010). A cross-cultural analysis of intellectual asset protection in SMEs: The effect of environmental scanning, Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(2). 167-183.
  13. Birk, F. (2006). The use of Intellectual Property Rights among Nordic Service Companies. Oslo: Nordic Innovation Center.
  14. Blass, A. (1992). Learning the soft way, Far Eastern Economic Review. 155, 54-56.
  15. Blind, K., Edler, J., Schmoch, U., Anderson, B., Howells, J., Miles, I., Roberts, J., Green, L., Evangelista, R., Hipps, C. and Herstatt, C. (2003). Patents in the Service Industries, Final Report. FhG-ISI, Karlsruhe.
  16. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  17. Byrne, B. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS, basic concepts, applications. and programming, 2th edition, London: LEA Publishers.
  18. Byrne, B.M. (1989). A Primer of LISREL: Basic Applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Analytic Models. New York, NY: Springer.
  19. Chau, P. (1997). Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach, Decision Sciences. 28(2), 309-334.
  20. CHI Research (2003). Small Serial Innovators: The Small Firms Contribution to Technical Change. New Jersey, NJ: Haddon Heights.
  21. Chou, C.P., Bentler, P.M. and Satorra, A. (1991). Scaled test statistics and robust standard errors for nonnormal data in covariance structure analysis, British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 44, 347-357.
  22. Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. and Walsh, J.P. (2000). Protecting their Intellectual Assets: Appropriability Conditions and why U.S. Manufacturing Firms Patent (or not). NBER Working Paper No. W7552.
  23. Cordes, J., Hertzfeld, H. and Vonortas, N. (1999). A survey of high technology firms, Office of Chief Counsel for Advocacy. United States Small Business Administration.
  24. European Patent Office (2007). EPO Scenarios for the Future: How might IP Regimes evolve by 2025? What Global Legitimacy Might such Regime have?. Munich: European Patent Office.
  25. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error, Journal of Marketing Research. 18, 39-50.
  26. García, P.L.D., Martínez, S.M.C., Maldonado, G.G., et al. (2009). Innovación y Cultura Empresarial de las MiPymes de Aguascalientes. Editorial UAA, México.
  27. Grolier Multimedia Encyclopedia (1995). Danbury CT, Grolier Electronic Publishing Inc.
  28. Hair, J.F., Anderson, R.E., Tatham, R.L. and Black, W.C. (1995). Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings. New York, NY: Prentice-Hall.
  29. Hanel, P. (2004). Current intellectual protection practices by manufacturing firms in Canada, Mimeo. Sherbrooke: University of Sherbrooke.
  30. Harabi, N. (1995). Appropriability of technical innovations: An empirical analysis, Research Policy. 24(6), 981-992.
  31. Hatcher, L. (1994). A Step by Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. Cary, NC: SAS Institute Inc.
  32. Heck, R.H. (1998). Factor analysis: exploratory and confirmatory approaches, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  33. Hu, L.T., Bentler, P.M. and Kano, Y. (1992). Can test statistics in covariance structure analysis be trusted?, Psychological Bulletin. 112, 351-362.
  34. Hughes, A. (2001). Innovation and business performance: Small entrepreneurial firms in the UK and the US, New Economy. 8(3), 157-163.
  35. Iversen, E. (2002). Norwegian SMEs and the IPR-System: exploration and analysis, Mimeo. Oslo: Centre for Innovation Research.
  36. Jensen, P.H. and Webster, E. (2006). Firm size and the use of the intellectual property rights, Economic Record. 82(256), 44-55.
  37. Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables and Square Methods. Moorsville, IN: Scientific Software.
  38. Kitching, J. and Blackburn, R. (1998). Intellectual property management in the small and medium enterprises (SME), Journal of Small Business & Enterprise Development. 5(4), 327-335.
  39. Kitching, J. and Blackburn, R. (2003). Innovation, intellectual property and informality, In: Blackburn, R. (Ed.), Intellectual Property and Innovation Management in Small Firms. London: Routledge.
  40. Kuusisto, J., Päällysaho, S. and Kulmala, R. (2005). Informal Ways to Protect Intellectual Property in Small and Medium-Size Business. Final Report, ProACT Project.
  41. Levin, R.C., Klevorick, A.K., Nelson, R.C. and Winter, S.G. (1987). Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brooking Papers on Economic Activity. 3, 783-831.
  42. Lloyd, W.F. (1995). Intellectual property rights & associated challenges for small business, Journal of Business & Entrepreneurship. 7(2), 93-102.
  43. Lykes, C. (1994). Intellectual property law for small business, Small Business Development Center Perspectives. 2, 9-11.
  44. Macdonald, S. (2004). When means become ends: considering the impact of patent strategy on innovation, Information Economic and Policy. 16, 135-158.
  45. Miles, I., Anderson, B., Boden, M. and Howells, J. (2000). Service production and intellectual property, International Journal of Technology Management. 20(1/2), 95-115.
  46. Moulin, A. and Thue-Lie, H. (2005). Intellectual Property Rights and Nordic SMEs: A Study of IPR Practice in the IT and Biotech Sectors. Oslo: Leogriff AS.
  47. Nunnally, J.C. and Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3ª Ed. New York, NY: McGrawHill.
  48. Päällysaho, S. and Kuusisto, J. (2008). Intellectual property (IP) protection as a key driver of service innovation: An analysis of innovative KIBS business in Finland and the UK, International Journal of Service Technology and Management. 9(3/4), 268-284.
  49. Päällysaho, S. and Kuusisto, J. (2011). Informal ways to protect intellectual property (IP) in KIBS business, Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice. 13, 62-76.
  50. Papke-Shields, K.E., Malhotra, M.J. and Grover, V. (2002). Strategic manufacturing planning systems and their linkage to planning system success, Decision Science. 13(1), 1-30.
  51. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size and innovation, Small Business Economics. 22, 141-153.
  52. Satorra, A. and Bentler, P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis, American Statistics Association 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Sections. 208-313.
  53. Schumpeter, J.A. (1934). The Theory of Economic Development: An Inquiry into Profit, Capital, Credit, Interest and the Business Cycle. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  54. Segars, A.H. and Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis, MIS Quarterly. 17(4), 517-525.
  55. Steinberger, B.S. (1990). US intellectual property protection for business. Unpublished manuscript.
  56. Tang, P. and Molas-Gallart, J. (2004). Securing Intellectual Property in Collaborative Environments: A Guide. Brighton: SPRU, University of Sussex.
  57. US Department of Commerce (1992). Basic Facts about Trademarks. Washington, DC: Patent and Trademark Office.
  58. WIPO (2003). WIPO survey of intellectual property services of European technology incubators, Mimeo. Geneva.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

> >>