Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

VENTAJA COMPETITIVA Y DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO

Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2012): La arquitectura financiera en las organizaciones para la competitividad: 978-607-96203-0-1

Análisis de la Gestión ambiental e Innovación como ventajas competitivas en la cadena de valor de la agroindustria en Michoacán

Enviado
junio 20, 2016
Publicado
2018-08-25

Resumen

En este artículo se analiza la importancia de la gestión ambiental y la innovación  como ventajas competitivas  en la cadena de valor de  las empresas exportadoras de aguacate ubicadas en Uruapan, Michoacán. El análisis o medición de las dimensiones mencionadas se realiza hasta los indicadores del modelo utilizado en esta investigación, ya que, al llevar la medición hasta este plano de análisis permite conocer o mostrar el origen de  las ventajas competitivas. Es decir no es suficiente ver la ventaja competitiva de manera total, es necesario conocer de donde proviene. Además se muestra la cadena de valor del sistema producto aguacate, la cual está formada por los agentes económicos, viveristas, productores, empacadores y transportistas. Así como los resultados del análisis de sus actividades al cuidado al medio ambiente y la innovación.

Citas

  1. Acedo, F., Barroso, C., & Galan, J. L. (2006). The resource-based theory: dissemination and main trends. Strategic Management Journal , 27 (7), 621-36.
  2. Agopecuaria, I. (12 de Febrero de 2008). iMAGEN Agropecuaria.Com. Recuperado el Marzo de 2008
  3. Alderson, W. (1 de January de 1937). A marketing view of competition. Journal of Marketing .
  4. Anthony, S., Johnson, M., & Eyring, M. (2004). A Diagnostic for Disruptive Innovation. Harvard Business School-Working Knowledge.
  5. Autio, E., Hameri, A. p., & Vuola, O. (2004). A framework of industrial knowledge spillovers in big-science centers. Research Policy , 33 (1), 107-26.
  6. Bar-Eli, M., Galily, Y., & Israeli, A. (2008). Gaining and sustaining competitive advantage: on the strategic similarities between Maccabi Tel Aviv BC and FC Bayern München. European Journal for Sport and Society , 5 (1), 75-96.
  7. Barney, B. (1986). "Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck,and Business Strategy. Management Science (32), 1231-41.
  8. Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management , 17, 99-120.
  9. Becheikh, N., Landry, R., & Amara, N. (2006). Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: a systematic review of the literature from 1993-2003. Technovation , 26, 644-64.
  10. Bell, D. (2004). Grocery and food Service Trends. National Farm Products .
  11. Bonales, J., & Sánchez, ,. M. (2003). Competitividad de las empresas exportadoras de aguacate. Morelia, MICHOACÁN, MÉXICO: UMSNH.
  12. Bottazzi, L., & Peri, G. (2003). “Innovation and spillovers in regions: evidence from European patent data”. European Economic Review , Vol. 47 (4), 687-710.
  13. Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995). Product development: past research, present findings. Academy of Management Review , 20 (2), 343-78.
  14. Castanias, R., & Helfat, C. E. (1991). Managerial resources and rents. Journal of Management , 17 (1), 155-71.
  15. Chen, C., & Lin, B. (2004). The effects of environment, knowledge attribute organizational climate, and firm characteristics on knowledge sourcing decisions. R&D Management , 34 (2), 137-46.
  16. Cheney, S., & Jarrett, L. (2002). Up-front excellence for sustainable competitive advantage. (E. Host, Ed.) Trainning and Development , 4.
  17. Collins, D., & Montgomery, C. (1995). "Competing on Resources: Strategy in the 1990". Harvard Business Review , July-August, 118-129.
  18. Competitiveness, C. o. (2007). Competitivenes Index, Where America Stands . Washington D.C.: Council of Competitiveness.
  19. Daft, R. (1983). Organization theory and design. New York: West.
  20. Das, T., & Kumar, R. (2010). Interpartner sensemaking in strategic alliances. Management Decision , 48 (1), 17-36.
  21. Drucker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist Society. New York: Harper Business.
  22. Dyer, J., & Singh, H. (1998). The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of International Competitive Advantage. Academy of Management Review , 23 (4), 660-679.
  23. Englhis, B., Solomon, M., Goldsmith, M., & Davey, M. (2005). Knowledge management as competitive advantage: lessons from the textile and apparel value chain. (E. G. Limited, Ed.) JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT , 9 (2), 91-102.
  24. Ghemawat, P. (1986). Sustainable Advantage. Harvard Business Review , 5 (64), 53-58.
  25. Grant, R., & Baden-Fuller, C. (2004). A knowledge accessing theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies , 41 (1), 61-84.
  26. Grimm, C., Lee, H., & Smith, K. (2006). Strategy as action: Competitive Dynamics and Competitive Advantage. Oxford New York: Oxford University Press Inc.
  27. Grønhaug, K., & Geir, O. G. (2007). Can theoretical knowledge and application yield competitive advantage? (E. G. Limited, Ed.) Marketing Intelligence & Planning , 25 (3), 232-240.
  28. Gulati, R., Nohria, N., & Zaheer, A. (2000). Strategic networks. Strategic Management Journal , 21 (3), 203-15.
  29. Hamel, G. (1991). Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal , 12, 83-103.
  30. Haveman, H. (1993). Follow the leader: mimetic isomorphism and entry into new markets. Administrative Science Quarterly , 38 (4), 593-627.
  31. Henard, D., & McFadyen, M. (2006). R&D KNOWLEDGE IS POWER. (A. Global, Ed.) Research Technology Management , 49 (3), 41.
  32. Hernandez Sampieri, R., & Fernandez, C. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: Mc Graw Hill.
  33. Hitt, M. A., Keats, B. A., & DeMarie, S. M. (1998). Navigating in the new competitive landscape: Building strategic flexibility and competitive advantage in the 21st century. Academy of Management Executive , 12, 22–42.
  34. Hoskinsson, R., Hitt, M. A., Wan, W. P., & Yiu, D. (1999). Theory and research in strategic management: swings of a pendulum. Journal of Management , 25 (3), 417-56.
  35. Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992). Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science , 3 (3), 383-398.
  36. Lubatkin, M., Florin, J., & Lane, P. (2001). Learning together and apart: a model of reciprocal interfirm learning. Human Relations , 54 (10), 1353-65.
  37. Lundvall, B. (1992). National Systems of Innovation:Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. Frances Printer .
  38. Mahoney, J., & Pandian, J. R. (1992). The resource-based view within the conversation of strategic management. Strategic Management Journal , 13 (5), 363-80.
  39. Molina, J., & Dyer, J. H. (1999). On the relational view/response to relational view commentary. Academy of Management Review , 24 (2), 184-6.
  40. Montes, F. J., Moreno, A. R., & Fernández, L. M. (2004). Assessing the organizational climate and contractual relationship for perceptions of support for innovation. International Journal of Manpower , 25 (2), 167-80.
  41. Morales, M., & Pech, J. L. (2000). Competitividad y estrategia: el enfoque de las competencias esenciales y el enfoque basado en los recursos. Revista de Contaduría y Administración (197), 48-50.
  42. Naamani, G. (2007). Agrexco Tel-Aviv, Israel. Nations, United. (19 de February de 2007). GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS FOR BUILDING NATIONAL PRODUCTIVE CAPACITIES. TRADE AND DEVELOPMENT BOARD , 4.
  43. Noguera, J., & Pecchecnino, R. (2007). “OPEC and the international oil market: can a cartel fuel the engine of economic development. International Journal of Industrial Organization , 25 (1), 187-99.
  44. Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, ,. H. (1995). "The Knowledge-creating Company:How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. Oxford University Press .
  45. Nonaka, I; Takeuchi, H. (1999). La organizaciòn creadora de conocimiento; como las compañias japonesas crean la dinámica de la innovación. Ciudad de México, México: Oxford University Press.
  46. O’Shannassy, T. (2008). Sustainable competitive advantage or temporary competitive advantage :Improving understanding of an important strategy construct. (E. G. Limited, Ed.) Journal of Strategy and Management , 1 (2), 168-180.
  47. Ortt, J., & Smits, R. (2006). Innovation management: different approaches to cope with the same trend. International Journal of Technology Management , 34 , 296-318.
  48. Pateli, A. (2009). Decision making on governance of strategic technology alliances. Management Decision , 47 (2), 246-70.
  49. Peteraf, M. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal , 14 (3), 179-91.
  50. Pillania, R. (2008). New Knowledge Creation Scenario in Indian Industry. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management , 6 (3), 49-57.
  51. Porter, H. (2005). Detecting collusion. Review of Industrial Organization , 26 (2), 147-67.
  52. Porter, M. (1985). Competitive Advantage (Vigésima reimpresión ed.). (F. Press, Ed.) México: Editoreal Continental.
  53. Ren, L., Xie, G., & Krabbendam, K. (2010). Sustainable competitive advantage and marketing innovation within firms A pragmatic approach for Chinese firms. Management Research Review , 33 (1), 79-89.
  54. Ritala, P., & Hanna-Kaisa, E. (2010). Competitive advantage in interfirm cooperation:old and new explanations. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal , 20 (5), 367-383.
  55. Roberts, E. B. (2007). Managing invention and innovation. ResearchTechnology Management , 49 (1), 35–54.
  56. Rumelt, R. P. (2003). What in the World is Competitive Advantage? Policy Working Paper , 5.
  57. Rumelt, R. (1974). Strategy, Structure and economic perfomance. Harvard Business School, Cambridge MA.
  58. Sánchez, G. (2007). El Cluster del Aguacate en Michoacán. Uruapan, Michoacán, México: Fundación Produce Michoacán.
  59. Santillana. (1998). Diccionario de las Ciencias de la Educación (Undécima edición ed.). México|: Editoreal
  60. Santillana.
  61. Scarbrough, H. (1995). Blackboxes. Hostages and Prisoners. Organization Studies , 991–1019.
  62. Spanos, Y., & Lioukas, S. (2001). An examination into the causal logic of rent generation contrasting Porter’s competitive strategy framework and the resource-based perspective. Strategic Management Journal , 22 (10), 907-34.
  63. Teece, D. (1984). Economic analysis and strategic management. California Management Review , 26 (3), 87-110.
  64. Tirole, J. (2003). The Theory of Industrial Organization. Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press.
  65. Van Den Bosch, F., Baaij, M., & Volberda, H. (April de 2005). How Knowledge accumulation changed the competitive advantage of strategy consulting firms. (D. o. Environment, Ed.) ERIM Report Series Research in Management .
  66. Venegas, B., & Loredo, ,. N. (2008). El empleo de la cadena de valor en la búsqueda de la competitividad.
  67. Walters, D., & Rainbird, M. (2007). Cooperative innovation: a value chain approach. Journal of Enterprise Information Management , 20 (5), 595-607.
  68. Wang, Y.-L., Wang, Y.-D., & Horng, R.-Y. (2010). Learning and innovation in small and medium enterprises. (E. G. Limited, Ed.) Industrial Management & Data Systems , 110 (2), 175-192.
  69. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal , 5 (2), 171-80.
  70. Wernerfelt, B. (1995). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal , 5, 171-80. Zeng, Z. (2009). The comparison of innovation activities and international trade effect in China and Japan in the era of knowledge economy Empirical research on patents as an example. (E. G. Limited, Ed.) Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies , 2 (3), 211-228.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>