Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

INNOVACIÓN Y TECNOLOGÍA

Vol. 11 (2017): El valor del conocimiento y efectos en la competitividad: ISBN 978-607-96203-0-6

Calidad de la información y los servicios en la confianza de los contribuyentes en el Website del SAT

Enviado
mayo 3, 2018
Publicado
2018-07-18

Resumen

Las tecnologías de información siguen avanzando vertiginosamente, las actividades
gubernamentales no quedan fuera de este contexto, por tal motivo, el objetivo de esta investigación
es determinar el impacto de la calidad de la información y de los servicios prestados en la confianza
de los usuarios (contribuyente) del Website recaudador de impuestos en México. Para alcanzar la
meta, se lleva a cabo la revisión de la literatura y se aplica un cuestionario a 78 personas y el
análisis de regresión lineal con SPSS versión 21. El principal resultado indica que la calidad de la
información (relevante, precisa, oportuna, confiable, útil y actualizada) influye significativamente
en la confianza del contribuyente en los procesos electrónicos del Gobierno (seguridad en el manejo
de información y privacidad en los datos personales).

Citas

  1. Ballou, D., Wang, R., Pazer, H., y Kumar, G. (1998). Modeling Information Manufacturing Systems to Determine Information Product Quality. Management Science, 44(4), 462-484.
  2. Bélanger, F., y Carter, L. (2008). “rust and risk in e-Government adoption. Strategic Information Systems, 17, 165–176.
  3. Boon, O., Wilkin, C., y Corbitt, B. (2003). Towards a Broader Bases IS Success Model–Integrating Critical Success Factors and the DeLone and McLean’s IS Success Model. Australia: University Deakin.
  4. Carter, L., y Belanger, F. (2005). The utilization of e-Government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors. Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5–2).
  5. Chin, W. (1988). Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modeling. MIS Quarterly, 22(1), 7- 16.
  6. DeLone, W., y McLean, E. (2003). The DeLone and McLean Model of Information Systems Success: A Ten-Year Update. Journal of Management Information Systems, 19(4), 9-30.
  7. Edmiston, K. (2003). State and local E-government. The American Review of Public Administration, 33(1), (20–45).
  8. English, L. (1998). The High Costs of Low-Quality Data. Recuperado de http://www.dmreview.com/article_sub.cfm?articleId=771, (Octubre 2016).
  9. English, L. (2001). Information Quality Management: The Next Frontier. American Society for Quality's 55th Annual Quality Conference Proceedings (pp. 529-533). Milwaukee.
  10. Ferro, E., Loukis, E., Charalabidis, Y., y Osella, M. (2013). Policymaking 2.0: From theory to practice. Government Information Quarterly, 30(4), 359–368.
  11. Gilbert, D., Balestrini, P., y Littleboy, D. (2004). Barriers and benefits in the adoption of egovernment. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 17(4), 286−301.
  12. Grönroos, C. (1990). Service managing and marketing. Managing the moments of truth in service competition. Lexington, MA, USA: Lexington Books,
  13. Horsburgh, S., Goldfinch, S., y Gauld, R. (2011). Is public trust in government associated with trust in e-Government? Social Science Computer Review, 29(2), 232–241.
  14. ISO (1998). “ISO 9241-11. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on usability. Recuperado de
  15. http://www.it.uu.se/edu/course/homepage/acsd/vt09/ISO9241part11.pdf (Junio, 2017)
  16. Joshi, J., A. Ghafoor, Aref, W. G. y Spafford, E.H.. (2001). Digital government security infrastructure design challenges. IEEE Computer, 34(2), 66-72.
  17. Juran, J.M. (1988). Juran's Quality Control Handbook. McGraw Hill.
  18. Kahn, B., Strong, D., y Wang, R. (2002). Information Quality Benchmarks: Product and Service Performance. Communications of the ACM, 45(4), 184-192.
  19. Kettinger, W., y Lee, C. (1995). Exploring a ‘Gap’ Model of Information Services Quality. Information Resources Management Journal, 8(3), 5-16.
  20. Kim, D., D. Ferrin, y H. Rao. (2009). Trust and satisfaction, two stepping stones for successful e-Commerce relationships: A longitudinal exploration. Information Systems Research, 20(2),
  21. –257.
  22. Kumar, V., Mukerji, B., Butt, I., y Persaud, A. (2007). Factors for successful e-government adoption: A conceptual framework. The Electronic Journal of e-Government, 5(1), 63−76.
  23. Lee, J. L., Kim, H. J., y Ahn, M. J. (2011). The willingness of e-Government service adoption by business users: The role of offline service quality and trust in technology. Government
  24. Information Quality, 28, 222-230.
  25. Lillrank, P. (2003). The Quality of Information. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 20(6), 691-703.
  26. Lin, C. J., y Lu, H. (2000). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use a Web site. International Journal of Information Management, 20(3), 197−198.
  27. Luna, L. F., y Gil, J. R. (2014). Digital government transformation and Internet portals: The coevolution of technology, organizations, and institutions. Government Information Quality, 31, 545-555.
  28. McNeal, R., Hale, K., y Dotterweich, L. (2008). Citizen-government interaction and the Internet: Expectations and accomplishments in contact, quality and trust. Journal of Information Technology and Politics, 5(2), 213–229.
  29. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric Theory. New York, Estados Unidos: McGraw Hill Editorial.
  30. Papadomichelaki, X., y Mentzas, G. (2012). E-GovQual: A multiple-item scale for assessing egovernment service quality. Government Information Quality, 29, 98-109.
  31. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., y Berry, L. (1985). A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Its Implications for Future Research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41-50.
  32. Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V., y Malhotra, A. (2005). E-S-QUAL a multiple-item scale forassessing electronic service quality. Journal of Service Research, 7(3), 213−233.
  33. Park, C., y Kim, Y. (2003). Identifying key factors affecting consumer purchase behavior in an online shopping context. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 31(1),
  34. –29.
  35. Salaûn, Y., y Flores, K. (2001). Information Quality: Meeting the Needs of the Consumer. International Journal of Information Management, 21(1), 21-37.
  36. Sandoval, R., y Gil, J. R. (2012). Are government Internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(S1), S72–S81.
  37. Thompson, D., Rust, R., y Rhoda, J. (2005). The business value of e-government for small firms. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 16(4), 385–407.
  38. Verdegem, P., y Verleye, G. (2009). User-centered e-Government in practice: A comprehensive model for measuring user satisfaction. Government Information Quarterly, 26(3), 487–497.
  39. Wang, F. (2014). Explaining the low utilization of government websites: Using a grounded theory approach. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 610-621.
  40. Yavuz, N., y Welch, E. (2014). Factors affecting openness of local government websites: Examining the differences across planning, finance and police departments. Government Information Quarterly, 31, 574-583. Memoria del XI Congreso de la Red Internacional

Artículos similares

También puede {advancedSearchLink} para este artículo.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a