Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

Responsabilidad social, sustentabilidad y equidad de género

Vol. 16 (2022): Transformación digital como propuesta de valor para la competitividad ISBN 978-607-96203-0-11

Rentabilidad y ventajas de una mayor participación de la mujer en las principales empresas mexicanas

Enviado
diciembre 1, 2022
Publicado
2023-01-23

Resumen

En el presente trabajo se revisa el beneficio que tiene una mayor participación de la mujer en la alta dirección de las empresas que cotizan en la bolsa mexicana de valores. Se realizaron modelos de regresión, con datos panel anuales del año 2011 al 2020, para estimar la relación participación de la mujer-rentabilidad. Se efectuó con información histórica de las empresas cuyas acciones son o han sido miembro del índice de precios y cotizaciones (IPC), utilizando las variables rentabilidad (ROE), calificación ESG, calificaciones por pilares de ESG, el porcentaje de mujeres en el consejo de administración y el porcentaje de mujeres en la alta dirección. Los resultados muestran que existe una relación positiva y significativa de la rentabilidad con la calificación de gobierno corporativo y la participación de la mujer en la alta dirección. Por cada 1% adicional de participación de mujeres en la alta dirección, se incrementa el ROE en un 0.25%.

Citas

  1. Alonso-Almeida, M. del M., Rodríguez-García, M. del P., Klender Aimer-Cortez, A., y Abreu-Quintero, J. L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: an application to Mexican listed companies. Contaduria y Administracion, 57(1), 53–77. http://www.scielo.org.mx/pdf/cya/v57n1/v57n1a4.pdf
  2. Baltagi, B. H., y Chang, Y.-J. (1994). Incomplete panels: A comparative study of alternative estimators for the unbalanced one-way error component regression model. Journal of Econometrics, 62(2), 67–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(94)90017-5
  3. Barko, T., Cremers, M., y Renneboog, L. (2021). Shareholder Engagement on Environmental, Social, and Governance Performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 1, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-021-04850-Z/TABLES/12
  4. Bowen, H. R. (1953). Social Responsabilities of the Bussinesman (Harper and Row (ed.)).
  5. Capelle-Blancard, G., y Couderc, N. (2009). The Impact of Socially Responsible Investing: Evidence from Stock Index Redefinitions. The Journal of Investing, 18(2), 76–86.
  6. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1979.4498296, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1979.4498296
  7. Carroll, A. B. (1983). Corporate social responsibility: Will industry respond to cutbacks in social program funding? Vital Speeches of the Day, 49, 604–608.
  8. Clarkson, M. E. (1995). A STAKEHOLDER FRAMEWORK FOR ANALYZING AND EVALUATING CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 92–117. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1995.9503271994
  9. Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E., y Vercelli, A. (2008). Global Standards and Ethical Stock Indexes: The Case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx Index. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(S1), 185–197.
  10. Cornell, B. (2021). ESG preferences, risk and return. European Financial Management, 27(1), 12– 19. https://doi.org/10.1111/EUFM.12295
  11. Cornell, B., y Damodaran, A. (2020). Valuing ESG: Doing Good or Sounding Good? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3557432
  12. Davis, K. (1960). Can Business Afford to Ignore Social Responsibilities?: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.2307/41166246, 23–29. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166246
  13. Davis, K., y Blomstrom, R. L. (1968). BUSINESS AND ITS ENVIRONMENT*. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amj.1968.4297423, 11(2), 237–238. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.1968.4297423
  14. Derwall, J., Koedijk, K., y Ter Horst, J. (2011). A tale of values-driven and profit-seeking social investors. Journal of Banking y Finance, 35(8), 2137–2147.
  15. Donaldson, T., y Preston, L. E. (1995). The Stakeholder Theory of the Corporation: Concepts, Evidence, and Implications. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1995.9503271992, 20(1), 65–91. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1995.9503271992
  16. Eccles, N. S., y Viviers, S. (2011). The Origins and Meanings of Names Describing Investment Practices that Integrate a Consideration of ESG Issues in the Academic Literature. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 389–402. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0917-7
  17. Escrig-Olmedo, E., Fernández-Izquierdo, M., Ferrero-Ferrero, I., Rivera-Lirio, J., y Muñoz-Torres, M. (2019). Rating the Raters: Evaluating how ESG Rating Agencies Integrate Sustainability Principles. Sustainability, 11(3), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030915
  18. Frederick, W. C. (1960). The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility: Http://Dx.Doi.Org/10.2307/41165405, 2(4), 54–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165405
  19. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Cambridge university press.
  20. Freeman, R. E. (1994). The Politics of Stakeholder Theory: Some Future Directions. Business Ethics Quarterly, 4(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.2307/3857340
  21. Friedman, M. (2007a). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance (pp. 173–178). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
  22. Friedman, M. (2007b). The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits. In Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance (pp. 173–178). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14
  23. García-Santos, J. J., y Zavaleta-Vázquez, O. H. (2019). Is the relationship between CSR activities and financial performance of organizations a short term result ? An answer with a panel data analysis. Contaduría y Administración, 64(4), 1–25.
  24. Godínez-Reyes, N. L., Gómez-Monge, R., Alfaro-Calderón, G. G., y Calderón-Gutiérrez, A. (2022a). Sustainable Value: An Empirical Research on Large Firms. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 337, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96150-3_14/COVER/
  25. Godínez-Reyes, N. L., Gómez-Monge, R., Alfaro-Calderón, G. G., y Calderón-Gutiérrez, A. (2022b). Sustainable Value: An Empirical Research on Large Firms. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, 337, 197–208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-96150-3_14/COVER/
  26. Gutiérrez, P. R., Fuentes, M. del M. F., y Ariza, L. R. (2014). Strategic Capabilities and Performance in Women‐Owned Businesses in Mexico. Journal of Small Business Management, 52(3), 541– 554. https://doi.org/10.1111/JSBM.12048@10.1111/(ISSN)1540-627X.WOMEN-IN-ENTREPRENEURSHIP
  27. Gyönyörová, L., Stachoň, M., y Stašek, D. (2021). ESG ratings: relevant information or misleading clue? Evidence from the SyP Global 1200. Journal of Sustainable Finance y Investment. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1922062
  28. Hong, H., y Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effects of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
  29. McGuire J. W. (1963). Business and society. McGRaw-Hill.
  30. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., y Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of who and What Really Counts. The Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022105
  31. Mozas-Moral, A., y Puentes-Poyatos, R. (2010b). La responsabilidad social corporativa y su paralelismo con las sociedades cooperativas. Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 103, 75–100.
  32. Naffa, H., y Fain, M. (2022). A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2021.102073
  33. Navarro, F. (2012). Responsabilidad social corporativa: Teoría y práctica. ESIC editorial.
  34. Newey, W. K., y West, K. D. (1987). A Simple, Positive Semi-Definite, Heteroskedasticity and Autocorrelation Consistent Covariance Matrix. Econometrica, 55(3), 703–708.
  35. Ozdemir, O., Kizildag, M., Dogru, T., y Demirer, I. (2021). Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Does board diversity matter? Journal of Global Business Insights, 6(2), 98–116. https://doi.org/10.5038/2640-6489.6.2.1169
  36. Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., y Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the Extended Enterprise: The New Stakeholder View. California Management Review, 45(1), 6–28. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166151
  37. Provasi, R., y Harasheh, M. (2021). Gender diversity and corporate performance: Emphasis on sustainability performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(1), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2037
  38. Przychodzen, J., Gómez-Bezares, F., Przychodzen, W., y Larreina, M. (2016). ESG Issues among Fund Managers—Factors and Motives. Sustainability, 8(10), 1078.
  39. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101078
  40. Refinitiv. (2019a). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores from Refinitiv. ESG Data. https://www.refinitiv.com/content/dam/marketing/en_us/documents/methodology/esg-scoresmethodology. pdf
  41. Refinitiv. (2019b). Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Scores from Refinitiv. ESG Data.
  42. Refinitiv. (2021a). Refinitiv Eikon. Thomson Refinitiv Eikon Login. https://eikon.thomsonreuters.com/index.html
  43. Refinitiv. (2021b). Refinitiv Eikon. Thomson Refinitiv Eikon Login.
  44. Reyes, N. G., Reyes, N. L. G., Monge, R. G., Gutiérrez, A. C., y Calderón, G. G. A. (2021a). Efficiency Analysis of Mexican Stock Exchange Sustainable Firms. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF, 17(1), e481. https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v17i1.481
  45. Reyes, N. G., Reyes, N. L. G., Monge, R. G., Gutiérrez, A. C., y Calderón, G. G. A. (2021b). Efficiency Analysis of Mexican Stock Exchange Sustainable Firms. Revista Mexicana de Economía y Finanzas Nueva Época REMEF, 17(1), e481. https://doi.org/10.21919/remef.v17i1.481
  46. Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving Beyond Dyadic Ties: A Network Theory of Stakeholder Influences. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1997.9711022107, 22(4), 887–910. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1997.9711022107
  47. SyP Dow Jones Indices LLC. (2019). SyP ESG Index Series Methodology. SyP DJI ESG Scores. https://us.spindices.com/documents/methodologies/methodology-sp-esg-indexseries. pdf?force_download=true
  48. Schröder, M. (2004). The performance of socially responsible investments: investment funds and indices. Financial Markets and Portfolio Management, 18(2), 122–142.
  49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11408-004-0202-1
  50. Schröder, M. (2007). Is there a Difference? The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indices. Journal of Business Finance y Accounting, 34(1–2), 331–348. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468- 5957.2006.00647.x
  51. Sheldon, O. (2004). The Philosophy of Management. The Philosophy of Management. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203507827
  52. Statman, M. (2000). Socially Responsible Mutual Funds. Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), 30–39. https://doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2016.42.2.140
  53. Swamy, P. A. V. B., y Arora, S. S. (1972). The Exact Finite Sample Properties of the Estimators of Coefficients in the Error Components Regression Models. Econometrica, 40(2), 261. https://doi.org/10.2307/1909405
  54. Thomson-Reuters. (2019). London Stock Exchange shareholders bless $27 billion Refinitiv deal - Reuters. Business News. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-lse-m-a-refinitiv/london-stockexchange- shareholders-bless-27-billion-refinitiv-deal-idUSKBN1Y01DD
  55. Truño, J. L., y Rialph, J. (2007). La responsabilidad social corporativa. In ACCID contabilidad y dirección (Ed.), Responsabilidad social corporativa. Edicoones gráficas Rey S.L.
  56. Walton, C. C. (1867). Corporate social responsibilities. Wadsworth.
  57. Wartick, S. L., y Cochran, P. L. (1985). The Evolution of the Corporate Social Performance Model. Https://Doi.Org/10.5465/Amr.1985.4279099, 10(4), 758–769. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1985.4279099
  58. Yoo, S., y Managi, S. (2022a). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2021.102108
  59. Yoo, S., y Managi, S. (2022b). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behavior towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.FRL.2021.102108

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>