Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio
Repositorio de la Red Internacional de Investigadores en Competitividad

VENTAJA COMPETITIVA Y DESARROLLO ECONÓMICO

Vol. 9 Núm. 1 (2015): La competitividad frente a la incertidumbre global: 978-607-96203-4

LA RELACIÓN DE LA INNOVACIÓN DE PROCESOS Y EL RENDIMIENTO EMPRESARIAL DE LAS MIPYMES INDUSTRIALES DE GUANAJUATO

Enviado
abril 13, 2016
Publicado
2016-04-25

Resumen

Como resultado de la globalización y de la alta competencia que ha marcado el entorno, así como la mayor exigencia por parte de los clientes, las empresas han tenido la necesidad de replantear sus estrategias a fin de mejorar su rendimiento empresarial. En este sentido, la innovación de procesos como estrategia empresarial permite a las organizaciones mejorar la eficiencia, productividad, flexibilidad y calidad de sus operaciones viéndose reflejado en un mayor nivel de rendimiento empresarial. Es por ello que al analizar la relación que existe entre la innovación de procesos con el rendimiento empresarial de las Micro, Pequeñas y Medianas Empresas (MiPymes) industriales de Guanajuato, los resultados obtenidos en nuestro estudio a través de la Modelización de Ecuaciones Estructurales (SEM), demuestran que existe suficiente evidencia empírica que indica que la innovación en procesos está altamente relacionada de manera positiva y significativa con el rendimiento empresarial de las MiPymes de Guanajuato.

Citas

  1. Anderson, J., & Gerbing, D. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: a review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  2. Ansoff, H. (1965). Corporate Strategy: an analytical approach to business policy for growth and expansion. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  3. Ar, I.M., & Baki, B. (2011). Antecedents and performance impacts of product versus process innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 14(2), 172 – 206.
  4. Augusto, M.G., Lisboa, J.V., & Yasin, M.M. (2014). Organisational performance and innovation in the context of a total quality management philosophy: An empirical investigation. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 25(9-10), 1141-1155.
  5. Bagozzi, R.P. & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74-94.
  6. Bentler, P.M. (2005). EQS 6 Structural Equations Program Manual, Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
  7. Bentler, P.M. & Bonnet, D. (1980), Significance tests and goodness of fit in analysis of covariance structures, Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
  8. Boachie-Mensah, F., & Acquah, I.S.K. (2015). The effect of innovation types on the performance of small and medium-sized enterprises in the Sekondi-Takoradi Metropolis. Archives of Business Research, 3(3), 77-98.
  9. Brown, T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research, New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  10. Buckley, J., & Mirza, H. (1997). Introduction in International Technology Transition by SMEs. UK: Macmillan.
  11. Byrne, B.M. (1989). A primer of LISREL: Basic applications and Programming for Confirmatory Factor Analysis Analytic Models. New York, NY: Springer.
  12. Byrne, B. (2006). Structural Equation Modeling with EQS, basic concepts, applications and programming. 2nd edition, London: LEA Publishers.
  13. Castillejo, A., Barrachina, M., Llopis, A., & Samchis, J. (2008). The Role of Process Innovation on SME Growth. Spanish Ministry of Science and Technology.
  14. Chandler, A.D. (1962). Strategy and Structure, Massachusetts: Institute of Technology Press.
  15. Cheng, L. & Tao, Z. (1999). The impact of public policies on innovation and imitation: the role of R&D technology in growth models, International Economic Review, 40(1), 187–207.
  16. Cohen, W.M., & Malerba, F. (2001). Is the tendency to variation a chief cause of progress? Industrial and Corporate Change, 10(3), 587-608.
  17. Comisión Europea (2008). European innovation scoreboard 2007. Comparative analysis of innovation performance.
  18. Cuevas, H., Aguilera, L., Estrada, S., & Ruiz, L. (2015). The innovation of Mexican micro, small & medium-sized enterprises. Empirical evidence through the structural equation modeling. Revista de Desarrollo Económico, 2(2), 165-176.
  19. Cuevas-Vargas, H., Aguilera, E.L., & González, A.M. (2015). La influencia de la innovación y el capital intelectual en la competitividad de las PYMES manufactureras de Aguascalientes. En J. Sánchez Gutiérrez et al. (Eds.), Sustentabilidad e innovación como detonantes de la competitividad (Vol. I, págs. 371-388). Guadalajara, Jalisco: Universidad de Guadalajara.
  20. Escribano A., Fosfuri A., & Tribo J.A. (2009). Managing external knowledge flows: The moderating role of absorptive capacity. Research Policy, 38(1), 96-105.
  21. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D.C., & Nelson, R.R. (2004). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. USA: Oxford University Press.
  22. Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
  23. Galia, F. & Legros, D. (2004). Complementarities between obstacles to innovation: evidence from France. Research Policy, 33, 1185-1199.
  24. Gálvez, E.J., & García, P.D.L.D. (2012). Impacto de la innovación sobre el rendimiento de la MIPYME: un estudio empírico en Colombia. Estudios Gerenciales, 28(122), 11-27.
  25. Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 516-529.
  26. Hair, J.F., Black, W.C., Babin, B.J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  27. Heunks, F. (1998). Innovation, creativity and success. Small Business Economics, 10(3), 263-272.
  28. Jöreskog, K.G. & Sörbom, D. (1986). LISREL VI: Analysis of Linear Structural Relationships by Maximum Likelihood, Instrumental Variables and Square Methods, Moorsville, IN: Scientific Software.
  29. Keizer, J., Dijkstra, L. & Halman, J. (2002). Explaining innovative efforts of SMEs. An exploratory survey among SMEs in the mechanical and electrical engineering sector in Netherlands. Technovation, 22(1), 1–13.
  30. Lager, T. (2002). Product and process development intensity in process industry: a conceptual and empirical analysis of the allocation of company resources for the development of process technology. International Journal of Innovation Management, 6(2), 105-130.
  31. Liu, Y., Li, Y., & Wei, Z.L. (2009). How organizational flexibility affects new product development in an uncertain environment: Evidence from China. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(1), 18-29.
  32. López-Mielgo, N., Montes-Peón, J.M., & Vázquez-Ordás, C.J., (2009). Are quality and innovation management conflicting activities? Technovation, 29(8), 537-545.
  33. Madrid-Guijarro, A., Garcia-Perez-De-Lema, D. & Van Auken, H. (2013). An investigation of Spanish SME Innovation during different economic conditions. Journal of Small Business Management, 51(4), 578-601.
  34. Maldonado, G., Madrid, A., Martínez, M., & Aguilera, L. (2009). Los efectos de la innovación en el rendimiento de las MIPYMES de Aguascalientes: una evidencia empírica. Revista de economía, 27(73), 49-69.
  35. Martin, M.S., & Namusonge, M.J. (2014). Influence of innovation on small and medium enterprise (SME) growth- A case of Garment manufacturing industries in Nakuru County. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 2(5), 31-41.
  36. Menéndez, J., López, J., Rodríguez, A., & Francesco, S. (2007). El impacto del uso efectivo de las TIC sobre la eficiencia técnica de las empresas españolas. Estudios Gerenciales, 23(103), 65-84.
  37. Mone, M.A., McKinley, W. & Bargar, V.L. (1998). Organizational decline and innovation: a contingency framework, Academy of Management Review, 32, 115-132.
  38. Nunnally, J.C. & Bernstein, I.H. (1994). Psychometric Theory, 3ª Ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  39. OCDE (2005). Oslo Manual: Proposed Guidelines for Collecting and Interpreting Technological Innovation Data. Paris.
  40. Olson, E.M., Walker Jr, O.C., & Ruekert, R.W. (1995). Organizing for effective new product development: The moderating role of product innovativeness. The Journal of Marketing, 59(1), 48-62.
  41. O’Regan, N., Ghobadian, A. & Sims, A. (2005). Fast tracking innovation in manufacturing SMEs. Technovation, 25(1), 1-11.
  42. Ortega Muñoz, V. J. (2013). Relación entre innovación y desempeño organizacional. Un estudio empírico en empresas industriales del Eje Cafetero (Master dissertation, Universidad Nacional de Colombia-Sede Manizales).
  43. Papke-Shields, K.E., Malhotra, M.J., & Grover, V. (2002). Strategic manufacturing planning systems and their linkage to planning system success. Decision Science, 13(1), 1-30.
  44. Peters, B. (2008). Innovation and firm performance: An empirical investigation for German firms. Working Paper, Center for European Economic Research, Mannheim, Germany.
  45. Pinzón, C.S.Y. (2009). Impacto de la Orientación a Mercado en la Innovación en Empresas de Aguascalientes. Tesis Doctoral, Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí, México.
  46. Quinn, R., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377.
  47. Reichstein, T., & Salter, A. (2006). Investigating the sources of process innovation among UK manufacturing firms. Industrial and Corporate Change, 15(4), 653-682.
  48. Satorra, A. & Bentler, P.M. (1988). Scaling corrections for chi square statistics in covariance structure analysis. American Statistics Association 1988 Proceedings of the Business and Economic Sections, 308-313. Alexandria, VA: American Statistical association.
  49. Segars, A.H. & Grover, V. (1993). Re-examining perceived ease of use and usefulness: a confirmatory factor analysis, MIS Quarterly, 17(4), 517-525.
  50. Sistema de Información Empresarial Mexicano. (8 de Marzo de 2015). Obtenido de Directorio de Empresas: http://www.siem.gob.mx/siem/estadisticas/estadotamanoPublico.asp?tam=3&p=1
  51. Sinclair, G., Klepper, S., & Cohen, W. (2000). What’s experience got to do with it? Sources of cost reduction in a large specialty chemicals producer. Management Science, 46: 28–45.
  52. Storey, J. (2000). The management of innovation problem. International Journal of Innovation Management, 4(3), 347–369.
  53. Taylor, A. (2010). The Next Generation: Technology Adoption and Integration through Internal Competition in New Product Development. Organization Science, 21, 23-41.
  54. Turner, S.F., Mitchell, W., & Bettis, R.A. (2010). Responding to Rivals and Complements: How Market Concentration Shapes Generational Product Innovation Strategy. Organization Science, 21, 854-872.
  55. Van Auken, H., Madrid-Guijarro, A., & García, P.D.L.D. (2008). Innovation and performance in Spanish manufacturing SMEs. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 8(1), 36-56.
  56. Varis, M., & Littunen, H. (2010). Types of innovation, sources of information and performance in entrepreneurial SMEs. European Journal of Innovation Management, 13(2), 128 - 154
  57. Vermeulen, P. (2004). Managing product innovation in financial service firms, European Management Journal, 22(1), 43–50.
  58. Zahra, S., Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technology learning and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925-950.

Artículos más leídos del mismo autor/a

> >>