Ir al menú de navegación principal Ir al contenido principal Ir al pie de página del sitio

Estrategias financieras, emprendimiento, nearshoring, cs y era

Vol. 18 (2024): Sinergias del liderazgo mundial: fomento del crecimiento inclusivo, innovación en la IA, nearshoring y competitividad

Relación entre la obtención de patentes, los recursos financieros y el sistema nacional de innovación con el desempeño innovador

Enviado
marzo 26, 2025
Publicado
2025-07-01

Resumen

Este estudio analiza la relación explicativa entre la obtención de patentes, los recursos financieros y el Sistema Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología y los recursos financieros, con el desempeño innovador. La muestra estuvo conformada por 1,572 pymes pertenecientes al sector industrial manufacturero colombiano, seleccionadas con un muestre intencional, a través de un proceso no probabilístico. Para realizar el análisis estadístico, se utilizó el modelo de ecuaciones estructurales basado en las covarianzas (PLS-SEM). Los resultados indican una relación positiva y significativa entre la obtención de patentes y el desempeño. De igual forma, entre los recursos financieros y el desempeño innovador, así como, entre el Sistema Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología con el desempeño innovador.

Citas

  1. Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (s.f.). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-ofthe-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1294-1333.
  2. Ato, M., López, J. J., & Benavente, A. (2013). Un sistema de clasificación de los diseños de investigación en Psicología. Anales de Psicología, 29 (3), 1038-1059.
  3. Ayyagari, M., Demirgüç-Kun, A., & Maksimovic, V. (2011). Firm Innovation in Emerging Markets: The Role of Finance, Governance, and Competition. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 46(6), 1545-1580. doi:doi:10.1017/S0022109011000378.
  4. Barney. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17, 99-120.
  5. Blind, K., Krieger, B., & Pellens, M. (2022). The Interplay between Product Innovation, Publishing, Patenting and Developing Standards ZEW -. Estocolmo: Centre for European Economic Research Discussion Paper No. 22-018.
  6. Broekel, T., & Bednarz, M. (2018). Disentangling link formation and dissolution in spatial networks: An application of a two-mode STERGM to a project-based R&D network in the German Biotechnology industry. Papers in Evolutionary Economic Geography (PEEG), 18(3), 677-704.
  7. Bronkhors, E., Caballo, E., & Van Dorth Tot , T. M. (20147). Innovative Financing Schemes. Current Practices and Innovations in Smallholder Palm Oil Finance in Indonesia and Malaysia: .
  8. Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2012). Do financing constraints matter for R&D? Eur. Econ. Rev., 56(8), 12-29.
  9. Capone, F., & Lazzeretti, L. (2018). The Different Roles of Proximity in Multiple Informal Network Relationships:Evidencefrom the Cluster of High Technology Applied to Cultural Goods in Tuscany.”Industry and 25(9): 897–917. Industry and Innovation, 25(9), 897-917.
  10. Cenfetelli, R. T., & Bassellier, G. (2009). Interpretation of formative measurement in information systems research. MIS Quarterly,, 33(4), 689-707.
  11. Chemmanur, T. J., & Fulghieri, P. (2014). Entrepreneurial Finance and Innovation: An Introduction and Agenda for Future Research. , 27(1),. The Review of Financial Studies, 27(1), 1-19.
  12. Cheng, H., & Wang, B. (2019). Multiplier Effect of Science and Technology Innovation in Regional Economic Development: Based on Panel Data of Coastal Cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 883-890. Obtenido de https://www.jstor.org/stable/26854067.
  13. Cheng, H., & Wang, B. (2019). Multiplier Effect of Science and Technology Innovation in Regional Economic Development: Based on Panel Data of Coastal Cities. Journal of Coastal Research, 883-890. doi:https://www.jstor.org/stable/26854067.
  14. Corchuelo, B., & Carvalho, L. (s.f.). Innovative activity and propensity to innovate in extremaduran KIBS companies.,. International Journal of Innovation Management, 24(7), 1-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.1142/S1363919620500620
  15. DANE Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadisticas. (2017). Metodología General de Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica en la Industria Manufacturera . Obtenido de https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-inn
  16. DANE Departemento Administativo Nacional de Estadisticas. (2019). Encuesta de Desarrollo e Innovación Tecnológica Industria Manufacturera. Bogota: DANE. Obtenido de https://www.dane.gov.co/index.php/estadisticas-por-tema/tecnologia-e-innovacion/encuesta
  17. Demirkan, I. (2018). The impact of firm resources on innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 21(4), 672-694. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0196.
  18. Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, J. A. (2006). Formative Versus Reflective Indicators in Organizational Measure Development: A Comparison and Empirical Illustration. British Journal of Management, 263–282. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2006.0050
  19. Erzurumlu, S., Erzurum, Y., & Yoon, Y. (2022). National innovation systems and dynamic impact of institutional structures on national innovation capability: A configurational approach with the OKID method, . Technovation, 114.
  20. Fan, F., Lian, H., & Wang, S. (2019). Can Regional Collaborative Innovation Improve Innovation Efficiency? An Empirical Study of Chinese Cities. ”Growth and Change, 51, 440-463.
  21. Fulghieri, P., & Sevilir, M. (2009). Organization and Financing of Innovation, and the Choice between Corporate and Independent Venture Capital. The Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 44(6), 1291-1321.
  22. Gardocka-Jałowiec, A., & Wierzbicka, K. (2019). Barriers to Creating Innovation in the Polish Economy in the Years 2012-2016. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 59(1), 211-225. doi:https://doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2019-0038
  23. Guo, D., Guo, Y., & Jiang, K. (2022). Government R&D support and firms’ access to external financing: funding effects, certification effects, or both? Technovation, 115, 102469, ISSN 0166-4972. . doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2022.102469.
  24. Hadjimanolis, A. (1999). Barriers to innovation for SMEs in a small less developed country (Cyprus). Technovation, 19, 561-570.
  25. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. M., & Sarsted, M. (2022). A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM) . Oklan: Sage. Thousand Oaks.
  26. Hall, B., & Lerner , J. (2010). The financing of R&D and innovation. In Handbook of the Economics of Innovation. California: Handbook of the Economics of Innovation, Elsevier-North Holland.
  27. Hottenrott, H., & Peters, B. (2012). Innovative capability and financing constraints for innovation: more money, more innovation? , 94(4),. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 94(4), 1126–1142.
  28. Hwang, I. (2023). Evolution of the collaborative innovation network in the Korean ICT industry: a patent-based analysis. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 221-236.
  29. Kim , k., & Altmann , J. (2017). “Effectof Homophily on Network Formation.”Communications in Nonlinear Science andNumerical Simulation44: 1339–1351. Communications in Nonlinear Science and Numerical Simulation(24), 1339-1351.
  30. Kim, K., & Altmann, J. (2017). Effect of homophily on network formation. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat, 1339–1351.
  31. Kramer, F. D., & Wrightson, J. A. (2016). The role of finance. En Innovation, Leadership, and National Security. . Atlantic Council., 11-13.
  32. Lampe, R., Moser, P., & Pools, , P. (2016). Competition, and Innovation—Evidence from 20 US Industries under the New Deal. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 32 , 1-36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/jleo/ewv014
  33. Madeira, M., Carvalho, J., Moreira, J., & Duarte, F. (2017). Barriers to Innovation and the Innovative Performance of Portuguese Firms. Journal of Business, 2-22.
  34. Mingting, K., Yuanqi, Y., & Kaihua, C. (2020). The impact of external R&D financing on innovation process from a supply-demand perspective. Economic Modelling, 92, 375-387.
  35. Morrar, R., & Abdelhadi, M. (2016). Obstacles of Innovation and Innovation Capabilities in Knowledge Intensive Business Service Sector in Palestin. J. Ins. Econ, 54-63.
  36. Myers, S., & Majluf , N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. Journal of Financial Economics,, 13(2), 187-221. doi:Myers, S. & Majluf, N. (1984). Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0.
  37. Nelson, R. R. (1991). Why do Firms Differ, and How Does it Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12, 61-74., 61-71.
  38. OECD & EUROSTAT. (2005). Proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data . Oslo Noruega : OECD Publishing.
  39. Parrilli, M. D., & Elola, A. (2012). The strength of science and technology drivers for SME innovation. Small Business Economics, 34(9), 897-907.
  40. Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
  41. Peteraf , M. A. (1993). The Cornerstones of Competitive Advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 179-191.
  42. Prahalad, C. K., & Hamel, G. (1990). The core competence of the corporation. Harvard Business Review, 79-91.
  43. Rehman, S. U., Bhatti, A., & Chaudhry, N. (2019). Mediating effect of innovative culture and organizational learning between leadership styles at third-order and organizational performance in Malaysian SMEs. Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, 14-27.
  44. Reinartz, W., Haenlein, M., & Henseler, J. (2009). An empirical comparison of the efficacy of covariance-based and variance-based SEM. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 26(4), 332-344.
  45. Ringle, C. M., Wende, S., & Becker, J. M. (2015). SmartPLS . SmartPLS GmbH, 21-54.
  46. Shi, Y., Gong, L., & Chen , J. (2019). Effect of Financing on Firm Innovation: Multiple Case Studies on Chinese Manufacturing. Enterprises. Emerging Markets Finance and Trade, 55(4), 863-888. doi:10.1080/1540496X.2018.1478284.
  47. Stojčić, N. (2020). Collaborative Innovation in Emerging Innovation Systems: Evidence from Central and Eastern Europe. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 46, 531–562.
  48. Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 509-533.
  49. Trinugroho, I., Hook, S., Chang, W., & Wiwoho, J. (2021). Effect of financial development on innovation: Roles of market institutions. . Economic Modelling,, 103. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105598
  50. Wernerfelt, B. (1984). A resource-based view of the firm. Strategic Management Journal, 5(5), 171- 180. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250050207
  51. Wipulanusat, W., Panuwatwanich, K., & Stewart, R. (s.f.). Drivers and barriers to innovation in the Australian public service: A qualitative thematic analysis. Engineering Management in Production and Services, 11(2), 7-22.